Difference between revisions of "Talk:Composite analysis"

Revision as of 12:57, 26 March 2009

130 visitors and 0 contributions

Do you think that this is a good idea (comosite analysis wiki)?

Is this information in other wiki?

Well maybe you should kick it off with an example and others can tune in with improvements

/C

Element size seems reasonable, if the results appears strange later on, it's just a matter of using code_aster to convert it to quadratic elements - but I'm no expert.

Well as you say; units matter, but I would prefer [m] in this case for some reason :)

/C

Thanks. It's nice to hear a voice with comments.