Difference between revisions of "Talk:Composite analysis"
From CAELinuxWiki
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Well as you say; units matter, but I would prefer [m] in this case for some reason :) | Well as you say; units matter, but I would prefer [m] in this case for some reason :) | ||
| + | |||
| + | /C | ||
----- | ----- | ||
Revision as of 11:03, 26 March 2009
130 visitors and 0 contributions
Do you think that this is a good idea (comosite analysis wiki)?
Is this information in other wiki?
Well maybe you should kick it off with an example and others can tune in with improvements
/C
Element size seems reasonable, if the results appears strange later on, it's just a matter of using code_aster to convert it to quadratic elements - but I'm no expert.
Well as you say; units matter, but I would prefer [m] in this case for some reason :)
/C
